Adi Cohen, themarker.com

"The decision to cancel TAMA 38 has created certainty in the planning policy and the housing market for years to come. It is clear to all of us that the plan needs to be completed, but gradually - and the next three years should be ready for the market. Alongside this, we have made sure to respond to complexes that will not be able to evacuate construction, "said Miri Cohen, Deputy Head of Housing at the Ministry of Finance, at a conference of real estate appraisers at the Dan Eilat Hotel on Tuesday.

Cohen's remarks were made in response to criticism of the planning uncertainty from which the housing market in Israel suffers - including the decision to repeal TAMA 38, which was approved in principle by the National Planning and Building Council earlier this month.

Miri Cohen, Deputy Head of Housing at the Ministry of Finance Photo: Marcelo Eilat

However, her support and sympathy for the National Council's cancellation of the TAMA 38 Council was difficult for Cohen to find partners in the panel., Attorney Micha Gadron and Attorney Eyal Mamu.

According to Kish, the decision to cancel the plan was "a classic example of the need for a working Knesset. It was a mistake to cancel the plan. It had to be repaired, but not canceled. I fear the market will not meet the timetable for preparation. The developers and tenants will all receive an answer. Every house in Israel needs a commander, and not just because of earthquakes. If there is no TAMA, you will not be able to build a Mdm. Those who lose out will not be Ramat Aviv C residents, but residents of southern Tel Aviv, where populations are weakened. "Kish continued:" In the absence of a working Knesset, we swiftly allowed to cancel TAM 38 - and I will fight to cancel the decision. "

In the statement of intent to fight the validity of the decision made at the professional planning institutions - Kish was not alone. Melchiali said that "everything has to be done to keep the 38th of Tama. As a social party, we will not be able to bury this plan - which provides a solution for the disadvantaged populations in Israel. For them, Tama 38 is an opportunity to increase the apartment by another 25 meters, renovate the old house, add a room. That's right, an entrepreneur comes and makes money at the expense of tenants perhaps - but he gives them the opportunity to improve their quality of life. "

In his remarks, Melchiali added that "the MFA said that it had helped her to her room. So what? Bat Yam No people who need help? In Raanana? Aren't these poor and needy neighborhoods needing our help? As for the periphery, the Planning Administration should come to the developers, give them construction percentages in Tel Aviv, and in return they will build in Kiryat Shmona and the periphery. The state does not know how to bring money for neighborhood rehabilitation, here comes the role of the developer to restore them instead of the state. "

Ginsburg argued that it was necessary to sit with the heads of authorities and planning officials before the decision was made, and agreed with Cohen on the certainty, but argued that the plan should be recalculated to different cities: "The TAMA is important so that no death traps are created here. In Ra'anana, 60% of the buildings that had to pass through the 38th TAMA, passed it. I met urban people who couldn't go down the stairs on the third floor, did not see daylight months, had to look at people in the affairs and required the authorities to make a plan that would allow the TAMA to continue, she gave hope. Financial to a lot of people. "

The Knesset members joined his mother: "Tama 38 is not a place for evacuation-construction, it is a complementary tool. There are countless buildings that are not suitable for construction, "Mamu gave as an example the city of Givatayim and the bureaucracy from which the developers are suffering, referring to the topic of the extension of the TAMA, which will end in three years:" There are four permits for construction evacuation that began work on them 20 years ago, what will be the fate of those TAMA 38 projects that will not reach the extension date ? ".

Gadron argued that the local government controls the Knesset and no real alternative to urban renewal can be passed: "The possibility lies in the Planning Administration, it was necessary to work on an amendment to the GDPR, to make supplementary legislation supporting the amendment. According to Gadron, TMA 38 failed in one thing because it failed to reach a point of balance where all the forces operating in the field agree on how the TAMA was implemented: "The plan has become the arena of conflict between the PA and the developers. And the occupants. "